[Scale-planning] Open Source in Education Track (was Re: About the Open Data Track)

Mon Aug 1 21:45:05 UTC 2016

We haven't yet made a decision around OSSIE for this year, but as a track
it has seen reduced attendance and submissions over the past few years. If
we can come up with some concrete plans around what we'd want it to look
like and discuss how we can get teachers to attend I'm sure we'd be happy
to arrange space again.

Another thing to keep in mind is we've gotten mixed feedback from teachers
on what day to hold OSSIE on if we continue to do so. On the one hand we
hear from many teachers they can't attend during the weekend as they have
trouble getting the school district to give them a day off for the
conference.  On the other hand, we also hear from them that they prefer to
keep their weekends to themselves rather than for training.

-Ilan

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> I've been watching silently from afar (summer in Montana). It looks like
> everything is coming along well, except for one thing that seems to be
> entirely missing: OSSIE (Open Source Software In Education.)
>
> A few years back there was still a dedicated OSSIE track. Have you given
> up entirely on having one? If not, I'll be happy to volunteer to help
> organize, publicize, coordinate, and do what ever else needs to be done to
> make it happen.
>
> Just let me know!
> Caryl
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Ilan Rabinovitch <ilan at socallinuxexpo.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Juan,
>
> The local big data community has been running a data tools/big data track
> the last few years of SCALE. It's possible that what you're looking for
> might be covered there?   OpenData in general has been a topic we've had
> requests for over the years, so we decided to add a one day track around it.
>
> That being said I think your email highlights an important point.  We find
> a lot of confusion from both attendees and speakers about what is relevant
> for a given track each year.  E.g. Is intro to kernel development a talk
> that belongs in the introductory/beginner track, a kernel track, or a
> developer track?
>
> With that in mind we have been looking to recruit experts around each
> track to help serve as "track leads".  The role involves writing a one
> paragraph abstract describing what type of content we are seeking for that
> track, helping to do targeted recruitment for invited speakers on those
> tracks, and finally participating in the voting/review process of sessions
> submitted via the CFP.
>
> Here is an example of what QCon has done for these track descriptions
>
> ===
>
> Track:  Containers -  From Dev to Prod
> Abstract: Containers came to prominence a couple of years ago with the
> promise of portability, flexibility and rapid deployments. They remain a hot
> topic in the industry and there are several success stories of companies
> deriving business value from the use of containers; especially in the area
> of developer experience. At the same time, container technology and the
> surrounding ecosystem are evolving very rapidly, which makes it difficult to
> assess its readiness for production use.
>
> In this track, we will hear from practitioners who are leveraging
> containers as part of their software delivery processes for a better
> developer
> experience, simplified operations, efficient resource utilization, or all
> of the above. Speakers will share their experiences in tackling the
> complex challenges around CI/CD, scheduling and orchestration, service
> discovery, monitoring etc. and
> what it takes to truly reap the benefits of container technology.
> Track Lead(s): Sangeeta Narayanan, Netflix
>
> ===
>
> This makes it very clear what the goal of the track is and what type of
> content they're seeking.
>
> If you see a track on the CFP that you think you'd be a good fit to lead,
> reach out to myself and Shyam (kapadia at socallinuxexpo.org). We'd love to
> have your help.  We're seeing at least 1 person per track, with 2 leads per
> track max.
>
> Thanks,
> Ilan
>
>
>
> Ilan Rabinovitch
> Conference Chair
> Southern California Linux Expo
> 877-831-2569 x110 Voice
> 818-442-1865 Mobile
> ilan at linuxfests.org Email
>
> ---
> Ask me about sponsorship and speaking opportunities at LinuxFests.org
> <http://linuxfests.org>'s upcoming events:
> DevOps Days SV -  June 24-25, 2016 - Mountain View, CA
> Texas Linux Fest - July 8-9, 2016, Austin TX
> SCALE 15x - March 2-5, 2017 - Pasadena, CA
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Juan J. Natera <naterajj at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was taking a look at the CFP page
>> (http://www.socallinuxexpo.org/scale/15x/cfp), when I read the
>> description of the Open Data track, which I quote here:
>>
>> "Open Data - This newly introduced track will focus on topics related
>> to Open Data in Science, Government, and other sources. This will
>> strive to answer questions such as: Why does Open Data Matter? What
>> are benefits of Open Data? What are the goals of the Open Data
>> movement? What is its current status?"
>>
>> As an Open Source enthusiast, I wholeheartedly agree with the
>> importance of Open Data, and realize there is a long road ahead of
>> those working to address this issue. However I believe that this
>> track, as described, would be more at home as a keynote in Data
>> focused conference. I am not saying it goes against SCALE's mission to
>> have this kind of content, far from it. but speaking also as an
>> attendee, I think SCALE users would be more interested in Open Source
>> tools for working with data (big or small), since it's already obvious
>> for most scale attendees that Open Data is just as good as Open Source
>> software.
>>
>> I also realize that Big Data is mentioned in the Cloud Track, but
>> isn't there enough interest in this topic to deserve its own track?
>>
>> Some food for thought,
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Juan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scale-planning mailing list
>> Scale-planning at lists.linuxfests.org
>> https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-planning
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scale-planning mailing list
> Scale-planning at lists.linuxfests.org
> https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-planning
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scale-planning mailing list
> Scale-planning at lists.linuxfests.org
> https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-planning
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfests.org/pipermail/scale-planning/attachments/20160801/fda91493/attachment.html>