[Scale-planning] Discussions on GH opened

Phil Dibowitz phil at ipom.com
Wed Aug 10 23:23:42 UTC 2022


Have you looked at the Discussions feature of GH? It's a full featured 
forum, not a discussion on a repo.

On 8/10/22 16:20, David Lang wrote:
> having two different channels for communications guarantees that people 
> will miss discussions happening on the other channel.
> 
> comments in a doc or on a repo are appropriate for discussing specific 
> changes, but not mroe general discussions IMHO
> 
> David Lang
> 
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> 
>> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:17:47 -0700
>> From: Phil Dibowitz <phil at ipom.com>
>> Reply-To: SCALE Planning List <scale-planning at lists.linuxfests.org>
>> To: scale-planning at lists.linuxfests.org
>> Subject: Re: [Scale-planning] Discussions on GH opened
>>
>> Moving this back to -planning. There's no secrets here.
>>
>> Perhaps people have opinions on how they'd prefer to interact. We 
>> should get input (if any) from the actual people on this list before 
>> deciding one path is better than the other, or that we need 1 vs 2 or 
>> 2 vs 1.
>>
>> On 8/10/22 13:35, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
>>> I believe if the repo is starred you will get notifications, but I 
>>> may be wrong.
>>>
>>> As it stands we get little-to-no-engagement on the mailing list. If 
>>> we want engagement, we should probably provide *more* ways to engage, 
>>> not less.
>>>
>>> That said, I don't mind if we want to kill the list. Since we're 
>>> moving docs to the GH wiki, moving discussions there just centralizes 
>>> stuff.
>>>
>>> On 8/10/22 13:28, Ilan Rabinovitch wrote:
>>>> having yet another place to check for a group of volunteers who are 
>>>> already busy is not a good idea.
>>>> If we're moving to github discussions then we should kill the 
>>>> mailing list.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 4:25 PM Phil Dibowitz <phil at ipom.com 
>>>> <mailto:phil at ipom.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Mailing lists are not-as-popular these days, so I've gone ahead and
>>>>     enabled the 'discussions' tab in the SCALE-Planning GH repo:
>>>>
>>>>     https://github.com/socallinuxexpo/SCALE-Planning/discussions
>>>>     <https://github.com/socallinuxexpo/SCALE-Planning/discussions>
>>>>
>>>>     Feel free to engage there!
>>>>
>>>>     --     Phil Dibowitz phil at ipom.com <mailto:phil at ipom.com>
>>>>     Open Source software and tech docs        Insanity Palace of 
>>>> Metallica
>>>>     http://www.phildev.net/ <http://www.phildev.net/>
>>>>     http://www.ipom.com/ <http://www.ipom.com/>
>>>>
>>>>     "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't
>>>>        matter and those who matter don't mind."
>>>>        - Dr. Seuss
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     Scale-planning mailing list
>>>>     Scale-planning at lists.linuxfests.org
>>>>     <mailto:Scale-planning at lists.linuxfests.org>
>>>>     
>>>> https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-planning
>>>>
>>>> <https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-planning>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scale-chairs mailing list
>>>> Scale-chairs at lists.linuxfests.org
>>>> https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-chairs
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scale-planning mailing list
> Scale-planning at lists.linuxfests.org
> https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-planning



More information about the Scale-planning mailing list