Moving this back to -planning. There's no secrets here.
Perhaps people have opinions on how they'd prefer to interact. We should get input (if any) from the actual people on this list before deciding one path is better than the other, or that we need 1 vs 2 or 2 vs 1.
On 8/10/22 13:35, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
I believe if the repo is starred you will get notifications, but I may be wrong.
As it stands we get little-to-no-engagement on the mailing list. If we want engagement, we should probably provide *more* ways to engage, not less.
That said, I don't mind if we want to kill the list. Since we're moving docs to the GH wiki, moving discussions there just centralizes stuff.
On 8/10/22 13:28, Ilan Rabinovitch wrote:
having yet another place to check for a group of volunteers who are already busy is not a good idea. If we're moving to github discussions then we should kill the mailing list.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 4:25 PM Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com mailto:phil@ipom.com> wrote:
Mailing lists are not-as-popular these days, so I've gone ahead and enabled the 'discussions' tab in the SCALE-Planning GH repo:
https://github.com/socallinuxexpo/SCALE-Planning/discussions https://github.com/socallinuxexpo/SCALE-Planning/discussions
Feel free to engage there!
-- Phil Dibowitz phil@ipom.com mailto:phil@ipom.com Open Source software and tech docs Insanity Palace of Metallica http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/ http://www.ipom.com/
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Dr. Seuss
_______________________________________________ Scale-planning mailing list Scale-planning@lists.linuxfests.org mailto:Scale-planning@lists.linuxfests.org https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-planning
https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-planning
Scale-chairs mailing list Scale-chairs@lists.linuxfests.org https://lists.linuxfests.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scale-chairs